Search results

Jump to: navigation, search

Page title matches

  • '''Work Package 3: Programme of measures''' '''Task 3.1: Review of existing rehabilitation measures'''
    10 KB (1,579 words) - 14:05, 24 November 2010
  • =WIKI page for measures= ==Live Link to other measures that are often used in combination ==
    643 B (82 words) - 17:21, 8 January 2010
  • =Other measures= [[Category:Measures]][[Category:09. Other aims to improve hydrological or morphological conditi
    794 B (87 words) - 15:29, 24 June 2015

Page text matches

  • ...ers and policy makers with the information necessary to develop mitigation measures to achieve good ecological status or good ecological potential in rivers bo
    2 KB (251 words) - 15:58, 3 February 2009
  • * Work Package 3: [[Programme of measures]]
    444 B (52 words) - 16:20, 3 February 2009
  • '''Work Package 3: Programme of measures''' '''Task 3.1: Review of existing rehabilitation measures'''
    10 KB (1,579 words) - 14:05, 24 November 2010
  • ...t appropriate tools to aid decision making of cost efficient programmes of measures. ...sk 4.2: Development of procedures for assessment of mitigation-remediation measures (M12- M21): Lead Partner ==
    6 KB (805 words) - 13:09, 17 February 2009
  • ...nterface and consultation with the stakeholders who will have to adopt the measures proposed. The project therefore has a specific work package (WP5) devoted t ...y with respect to protecting aquatic ecosystems, and promoting sustainable measures of improvement. Therefore no commercial exploitation activities are planned
    6 KB (835 words) - 14:06, 24 November 2010
  • ==Measures selection== == Related Measures ==
    872 B (81 words) - 16:20, 24 June 2011
  • ==Measures selection== == Related Measures ==
    10 KB (1,508 words) - 12:39, 17 December 2010
  • =WIKI page for measures= ==Live Link to other measures that are often used in combination ==
    643 B (82 words) - 17:21, 8 January 2010
  • ==Measures selection== == Related Measures ==
    10 KB (1,233 words) - 14:05, 24 November 2010
  • ...abandoned before to be fully built. Studies for rehabilitation/restoration measures were started in the Danube Delta immediately following its declaration as B ==Measures selection==
    10 KB (1,436 words) - 14:05, 24 November 2010
  • An integrated planning framework supports the design of river restoration measures. This framework is cyclic for both entire river basins (catchments) and ind ...etting end-points], [http://www.reformrivers.eu/cost-effective-restoration-measures-promote-wider-ecosystem-and-societal-benefits cost-effectiveness and benefi
    7 KB (927 words) - 14:21, 3 January 2019
  • :* D1.3 (M15) Portfolio of type and impact specific restoration / mitigation measures :* MS1.1 (M09) Review of significant impacts, water body types and mitigation measures as part of RBMPs
    3 KB (342 words) - 14:05, 24 November 2010
  • ==Measures selection== == Related Measures ==
    10 KB (1,495 words) - 16:53, 8 June 2010
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    5 KB (638 words) - 16:21, 14 November 2016
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    2 KB (343 words) - 14:54, 31 August 2015
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    1 KB (199 words) - 18:00, 21 May 2014
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    14 KB (2,110 words) - 14:55, 31 August 2015
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    8 KB (1,088 words) - 14:53, 31 August 2015
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    1 KB (192 words) - 18:02, 21 May 2014
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    1 KB (164 words) - 18:03, 21 May 2014
  • ==Measures selection== == Related Measures ==
    3 KB (415 words) - 14:06, 24 November 2010
  • ==Measures selection== == Related Measures ==
    1 KB (99 words) - 14:07, 24 November 2010
  • ==Measures selection== == Related Measures ==
    6 KB (765 words) - 09:50, 1 June 2010
  • ==Measures selection== == Related Measures ==
    3 KB (366 words) - 07:28, 26 May 2010
  • ==Measures selection== == Related Measures ==
    3 KB (421 words) - 14:13, 8 April 2010
  • ...REFORM project for improving the success of hydromorphological restoration measures. This wiki guides the practitioner along the results.
    2 KB (291 words) - 17:26, 18 December 2015
  • rect 322 466 842 658 [[How can we improve?|How can we improve? Programme of measures]] ...02 898 352 [[How can we improve?|How can we improve? Identifying potential measures]]
    2 KB (289 words) - 13:52, 18 December 2018
  • |measures=Structural modifications<br> Modify/replace existing structures<br>
    3 KB (529 words) - 14:05, 24 November 2010
  • ==Measures selection== == Related Measures ==
    1 KB (131 words) - 09:30, 8 April 2010
  • ==Measures selection== == Related Measures ==
    8 KB (1,117 words) - 14:59, 15 December 2015
  • |measures=Working with physical form and function of river and floodplains<br> Use
    1 KB (168 words) - 14:04, 24 November 2010
  • ==live Link to possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    567 B (72 words) - 17:27, 8 January 2010
  • ==Measures selection== == Related Measures ==
    1 KB (103 words) - 16:08, 25 November 2010
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    8 KB (1,092 words) - 16:28, 14 November 2016
  • ==Measures selection== -> Motivation/argumentation behind the selection of the measures implemented.
    2 KB (268 words) - 20:51, 15 June 2010
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    636 B (68 words) - 13:48, 18 March 2010
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    8 KB (1,082 words) - 09:42, 1 September 2015
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    622 B (65 words) - 13:49, 18 March 2010
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    4 KB (589 words) - 10:21, 1 September 2015
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    15 KB (2,127 words) - 10:09, 1 September 2015
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    6 KB (923 words) - 09:54, 1 September 2015
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    4 KB (526 words) - 09:48, 1 September 2015
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    2 KB (324 words) - 10:14, 1 September 2015
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    5 KB (753 words) - 10:33, 1 September 2015
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    7 KB (1,072 words) - 10:28, 1 September 2015
  • ==Possible restoration, rehabilitation and mitigation measures==
    3 KB (368 words) - 10:45, 1 September 2015
  • Direct measures for reduce surface water abstraction without return could be: [[Category:Measures]][[Category:01. Water flow quantity improvement]]
    12 KB (1,807 words) - 15:36, 24 June 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:01. Water flow quantity improvement]]
    10 KB (1,435 words) - 15:35, 24 June 2015
  • ...tration and retention may be applied in combination with other restoration measures (e.g. water storage, restoring side channels or former meander is firstly d [[Category:Measures]][[Category:01. Water flow quantity improvement]]
    9 KB (1,235 words) - 13:13, 22 December 2015
  • ...lders should be taken into account to choose the restoration or mitigation measures. Some management options that could be studied as alternatives are the foll [[Category:Measures]][[Category:01. Water flow quantity improvement]]
    6 KB (802 words) - 15:33, 24 June 2015
  • ...vers.eu/index.php/Modify_hydropeaking#General_Description/ read more about measures to modify hydropeaking here] [[Category:Measures]][[Category:01. Water flow quantity improvement]]
    5 KB (734 words) - 13:16, 22 December 2015
  • ...cipitation), with changes in national water rights, and with morphological measures. [[Category:Measures]][[Category:01. Water flow quantity improvement]]
    2 KB (298 words) - 17:27, 5 January 2016
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:01. Water flow quantity improvement]]
    2 KB (307 words) - 09:54, 22 January 2016
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:01. Water flow quantity improvement]]
    7 KB (958 words) - 15:32, 24 June 2015
  • ...me. Local and regional administrations are responsible to implement saving measures in public buildings and institutions, and encourage the sustainable use of :The same as other measures to increase water flow quantity
    6 KB (860 words) - 15:37, 24 June 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:02. Sediment flow quantity improvement]]
    530 B (64 words) - 15:09, 24 June 2015
  • ...rs. There are several websites and reports which give an overview on these measures, practices, and techniques, e.g. [http://www.fao.org/docrep/t1696e/t1696e02 ...tions are severely affected by excess bank erosion and the above mentioned measures cannot be applied, river banks may be stabilized using bio-engineering tech
    6 KB (912 words) - 15:53, 22 January 2016
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:02. Sediment flow quantity improvement]]
    636 B (82 words) - 09:59, 25 June 2015
  • ...to the reach (sediment deficit). Bed erosion can be reduced by restoration measures described in other fact-sheets: either by restoring a more natural flow reg ...tions are severely affected by excess bank erosion and the above mentioned measures cannot be applied, river banks may be stabilized using bio-engineering tech
    9 KB (1,216 words) - 10:19, 26 June 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:02. Sediment flow quantity improvement]]
    656 B (84 words) - 09:55, 25 June 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:02. Sediment flow quantity improvement]]
    6 KB (910 words) - 13:16, 11 May 2022
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:02. Sediment flow quantity improvement]]
    740 B (79 words) - 15:47, 24 June 2015
  • ...cipitation), with changes in national water rights, and with morphological measures. The concept of minimum flows should ensure that the economic use of water ...ing]). We would also refer to Thomas et al. (2011) who reviewed mitigation measures to sustain minimum runoff considering the whole catchment. E.g. they accoun
    5 KB (714 words) - 12:52, 7 January 2019
  • ...to analyse the gap with the current situation in order to set appropriate measures to achieve ecological flow (including the review of different methodologies ...authors further give recommendations on how to choose and implement these measures (based on experiences within Member States). For detailed reading please [h
    9 KB (1,243 words) - 12:57, 7 January 2019
  • ...d/or operational modifications. The following article gives an overview of measures reducing negative ecological effects associated with hydropeaking. <br /> Prior to the implementation of measures comprehensive investigations are recommended to assess negative ecological
    5 KB (755 words) - 17:17, 4 December 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:03. Flow dynamics improvement]]
    777 B (85 words) - 15:19, 24 June 2015
  • ...vers.eu/index.php/Modify_hydropeaking#General_Description/ read more about measures to modify hydropeaking here] [[Category:Measures]][[Category:03. Flow dynamics improvement]]
    5 KB (728 words) - 13:14, 22 December 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:03. Flow dynamics improvement]]
    731 B (78 words) - 15:15, 24 June 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:03. Flow dynamics improvement]]
    2 KB (229 words) - 15:54, 4 December 2015
  • The measures for ecological restoration projects in Europe on the River floodplains befo More emphases was given to measures aiming to restore lateral connectivity between rivers and floodplains since
    9 KB (1,355 words) - 15:23, 24 June 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:03. Flow dynamics improvement]]
    628 B (74 words) - 15:24, 24 June 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:04. Longitudinal connectivity improvement]]
    14 KB (2,182 words) - 15:42, 24 June 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:04. Longitudinal connectivity improvement]]
    791 B (84 words) - 15:20, 24 June 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:04. Longitudinal connectivity improvement]]
    5 KB (705 words) - 13:58, 7 January 2019
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:04. Longitudinal connectivity improvement]]
    771 B (80 words) - 15:28, 24 June 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:04. Longitudinal connectivity improvement]]
    781 B (83 words) - 15:27, 24 June 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:04. Longitudinal connectivity improvement]]
    774 B (80 words) - 15:15, 24 June 2015
  • ...d and straightened rivers is one of the most visually striking restoration measures which is also perceived as aesthetically pleasing by the public (Kondolf 20 ...by the newly created habitats and if there are other, more cost-effective measures to create these habitats besides re-meandering (see Nakano 2006, Friberg 19
    17 KB (2,348 words) - 15:37, 24 June 2015
  • ...l, S., Gacek, S., Lorenz, A. W. & Hering, D. (2009) Effects of re-braiding measures on hydromorphology, floodplain vegetation, ground beetles and benthic inver [[Category:Measures]][[Category:05. River bed depth and width variation improvement]]
    16 KB (2,204 words) - 16:25, 24 June 2015
  • ...a prerequisite for many floodplain measures and typically part of a set of measures to enhance channel-planform, floodplain and instream habitat conditions (e. ...orphological changes probably occur, and to select appropriate restoration measures. For example, if the reach is already downstream from the knickpoint and st
    15 KB (2,139 words) - 15:46, 24 June 2015
  • ...d and straightened rivers is one of the most visually striking restoration measures which is also perceived as aesthetically pleasing by the public (Kondolf 20 ...by the newly created habitats and if there are other, more cost-effective measures to create these habitats besides re-meandering (see Nakano 2006, Friberg 19
    17 KB (2,359 words) - 15:11, 24 June 2015
  • ...channel dynamics (lower cost and higher ecological effect) and additional measures are applied to enhance bed and bank habitats and to establish riparian vege [[Category:Measures]][[Category:05. River bed depth and width variation improvement]]
    5 KB (677 words) - 15:28, 24 June 2015
  • ...channel dynamics (lower cost and higher ecological effect) and additional measures are applied to enhance bed and bank habitats and to establish riparian vege [[Category:Measures]][[Category:05. River bed depth and width variation improvement]]
    5 KB (668 words) - 12:42, 7 January 2019
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:06. In-channel structure and substrate improvement]]
    4 KB (520 words) - 14:20, 24 June 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:06. In-channel structure and substrate improvement]]
    7 KB (990 words) - 15:44, 24 June 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:06. In-channel structure and substrate improvement]]
    10 KB (1,325 words) - 15:27, 24 June 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:06. In-channel structure and substrate improvement]]
    4 KB (590 words) - 15:21, 24 June 2015
  • ...the beneficial effects, gravel augmentation is often accompanied by other measures like establishing environmental flows capable of transporting the added sed [[Category:Measures]][[Category:06. In-channel structure and substrate improvement]]
    10 KB (1,424 words) - 12:33, 7 January 2019
  • .... using riprap). Removal of bank fixation is a prerequisite for many other measures like re-meandering or widening as well as initiating later channel migratio ...l bars) is described, which does not necessarily include other large scale measures to restore a natural planform or channel dynamics.
    5 KB (629 words) - 14:09, 7 January 2019
  • ...ment. However, as pointed out by Greig et al. (2005), the current granular measures of spawning and incubation habitat quality do not satisfactorily describe t [[Category:Measures]][[Category:06. In-channel structure and substrate improvement]]
    16 KB (2,236 words) - 15:31, 24 June 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:06. In-channel structure and substrate improvement]]
    7 KB (972 words) - 15:43, 24 June 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:06. In-channel structure and substrate improvement]]
    8 KB (1,116 words) - 15:34, 24 June 2015
  • ...ace for the development of riparian vegetation. The ability of restoration measures to host typical riparian species and to increase local plant diversity depe [[Category:Measures]][[Category:07. Riparian zone improvement]]
    4 KB (536 words) - 12:43, 7 January 2019
  • ...ing the sediment in place (Parkyn et al. 2003). The ability of restoration measures to host typical riparian species and to increase local plant diversity depe [[Category:Measures]][[Category:07. Riparian zone improvement]]
    4 KB (628 words) - 12:47, 7 January 2019
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:07. Riparian zone improvement]]
    589 B (64 words) - 21:32, 8 December 2015
  • ...on, extensification of land use and buffer strip maintenance are effective measures to reduce undesired sediment or nutrient inputs and should be established i ...nt management should be adopted in accordance with reach-scale restoration measures to manage fine sediment and nutrient input (Owens et al. 2005).
    6 KB (840 words) - 12:34, 7 January 2019
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:07. Riparian zone improvement]]
    496 B (57 words) - 21:47, 8 December 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:08. Floodplains/off-channel/lateral connectivity habitats impro
    5 KB (662 words) - 21:59, 8 December 2015
  • In anthropogenically constrained rivers, typical restoration measures include the the set back of flood levees, allowing channel movements within ...n be found in near-natural reaches (Rohde et al. 2005). The extent of such measures is often limited by land constraints and thus many projects are a combinati
    4 KB (510 words) - 22:05, 8 December 2015
  • [[Category:Measures]][[Category:08. Floodplains/off-channel/lateral connectivity habitats impro
    8 KB (1,067 words) - 12:35, 7 January 2019

View (previous 100 | next 100) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)