View source for Vääräjoki - Niskakoski

=Vääräjoki - Niskakoski=

<googlemap version="0.9" lat="64.054433" lon="24.220667" zoom="13" width="100%" height="400" scale="yes" overview="yes" toc="no" controls="large">
(A) 64.054433, 24.220667
</googlemap>

<Forecasterlink type="getProjectInfoBox" code="256" />

==Key features of the case study==

==Site description==
Vääräjoki is a mid-sized lowland river with 835 km2 catchment area. The river is altogether 107 km long and descends 110 metres from its source to the confluence of the rivers Vääräjoki and Kalajoki.

Water quality of Vääräjoki is deteriorated due to human activities in the catchment. 12 % of the catchment area is in agricultural use. Also forestry activities, such as land draining by ditches, increase the nutrient load and suspended solids.

Altogether 25 km of Vääräjoki were channelized for flood protection and timber floating starting in 1860s and continuing in several occasions until late 1950s. In 1959-1974 lake Evijärvi at mid reach of Vääräjoki was dried for flood protection. Altogether 900 ha of lake area was dried by channelizing the river and by embankments. Especially the activities for flood protection changed the riffle areas considerably: the water retention capacity of the river bed decreased and the heterogeneous flow patterns in riffle habitats disappeared.

==Measures selection==

All the rapids in section from 13 km to 29 km of the river mouth have been restored. The extensive works started in the late 1990s and finished in 2006. The stream bottom was rearranged using boulders that had originally been removed from the channel during channelization and placed along stream margins Also gravel beds were created to provide nursery habitat for salmonids. The aim of the restoration was to return the heavily modified river closer to natural hydrological and morphological state and especially enable the breeding and migration of fish. Funding for restoration came from regional water and fisheries boards.

At the time of writing in Autumn 2013, there are plans to continue the restoration works at the other reaches: the restoration plan for upstream reach 35-86 km from river mouth is ready and the restoration work is about to begin. The plan to restore the downstream part of the river (0-13 km from the river mouth) is about to be ready.

The riffles in upper part of the river and downstream reaches of the river are yet not restored. Vääräjoki was chosen as a REFORM WP4 “flagship” case study river due to the extensive restorations and because it is among the few rivers in Finland that still had non-restored upstream control sites to meet the study design of WP4 ([http://reformrivers.eu/deliverables/d43-results-hydromorphological-and-ecological-survey REFORM deliverable D4.3]
). Peurasaarenkoski is one of the channelized riffle sites and it is the non-restored control site in WP4 case study. Niskakoski is one of the restored riffle sections and it is  the restored site in WP4 case study (see photos below).

<gallery widths="180px">
File:V_picture1.jpg|One of the restored rapids in the river Vääräjoki
File:V_picture2.jpg|Non-restored section of the Vääräjoki river
</gallery>

==Success criteria==

The goals were to return the natural current conditions and morphology of the stream and to enable breeding and migration of salmonid fish.

==Ecological response==

Periphyton showed good quality in 2003. In 2009 and 2012, 11 fish sites were monitored. The monitoring indicated good status of the fish communities and no change to the previous results (EQR = 0,65). The ecological status of the restored section Vääräjoki has been assessed as moderate in first and second national assessment for WFD.
The ecological success of the restoration was evaluated in the REFORM-project by comparison between the upstream unrestored reach Peurasaarenkoski and the restored reach Vääräjoki.For macrophytes, total species richness was higher in the restored reach.  However, the average abundance of bryophytes was slightly lower in the restored reach. For macroinvertebrates, total density was at the same level in the restored and unrestored sites. However, the density of shredders, that are considered very sensitive to environmental disturbances, was higher in the restored reach.

<gallery widths="180px">
File:V_result_mp.jpg|Higher richness of macrophytes in the restored section
File:V_result_invert.jpg|Higher density of shredders in the restored section
</gallery>

==Hydromorphological response==

The hydromorphological response was evaluated in the REFORM-project by comparing  the upstream unrestored reach and the restored reach. Restoration was successful in creating more heterogeneous habitat: there was more variation in substrate and in spatial distribution of substrate in the restored section compared to non-restored site. However, the differences were not statistically significant. Moreover, restoration created more natural flow patterns, river dynamics and connectivity, and riparian and adjacent plant species composition, vegetation age and cover were more natural in the restored reach.

==Water quality response==

The restorations have likely not affected the water quality, water quality has deteriorated from moderate (2000-2007) to poor (2006-2012) status. 

==Monitoring before and after implementation of the project==

Before-after monitoring of the restoration success was not done. However, assessment of the ecological and water quality status of River Vääräjoki has been done after the restorations.

==Socio-economic aspects==

A socio-economic study (questionnaire) was conducted at Vääräjoki area as a part of REFOM-project in April 2013 ([http://reformrivers.eu/assessing-societal-benefits-river-restoration-using-ecosystem-services-approach REFORM deliverable D4.4]
). The questionnaire contained questions about residents’ general perception of the river, including water quality, floods and the restoration measures. The questionnaire contained also a choice experiment in which respondents were presented choice cards with two or more alternative future states and an option to maintain the current situation. The alternatives described different end states created through river restoration measures. 

“Willingness to pay”-survey was represented by an increase of annual municipality tax for the respondent’s household. To find sufficient respondents in the sparsely populated Vääräjoki basin three different methods were used: approaching visitors at nearby village centers, “door to door” interviews and approaching pedestrians at more sparsely populated rural areas.

The people at Vääräjoki area do visit the river often and appreciate it. They do not only appreciate the river for their own use, but also as a recreational area for other people to enjoy and as a habitat for organisms. Awareness about the river restorations is high and a large majority of the interviewed people perceives the restorations a good idea. Not everyone had a clear view on the effects of the restorations, but most consider improvements in ecological endpoints the main goal. The local people at Vääräjoki area are willing to pay for improved ecological conditions and a more natural view.

==Contact person within the organization==

Finnish Environmental Institute, Freshwater Centre

Jukka Aroviita 

E-mail: jukka.aroviita@ymparisto.fi

==Extra background information==

Vääräjoki is part of Kalajoki basin, where are several ongoing projects targeting to improved status of inland waters at the area.
 
'''MAHAKALA-project'''

When sulfate soils, typical to Kalajoki area, are exposed to oxygen, during soil preparation, ditching or natural land uplift, they might be oxidized and produce acidic runoff. Acidic sulfate soil may cause acidification of waters which might lead to leaking of heavy metals into the waters.  The aim of the MAHAKALA-project is study the effects and risks of the acidic soils to the environment and livelihoods.
[http://www.meidankalajoki.fi/index.php/hankkeet/mahakala-hanke Project Website]


'''Meidän Kalajoki (Our Kalajoki)-Project'''

Meidän Kalajoki -project is a co-operative initiative where local municipalities, officials, scientists, organizations and companies aim to contribute to the water protection in the Kalajoki basin, consult about the use of waters and find new ideas to improve the general appreciation of Kalajoki. The background of the project is the Water Framework Directive goals of good ecological status of waters but also the local aims to improve the scenery, conditions for fish and recreation of the Kalajoki basin. Project is funded by European Regional Development Fund.
[http://www.meidankalajoki.fi/index.php/hankkeet/meidan-kalajoki-hanke Project Website]

==References==

Aluehallintovirato. Ympäristöluvat. Lupapäätös Nro 2/12/2. Vääräjoen kalataloudellinen kunnostus, Sievi.

-Aronsuu K. & Isid D. 2010. Pohjois-Pohjanmaan jokien hydrologis-morfologiset muutokset sekä mahdolliset hydrologiaan ja morfologiaan vaikuttavat toimenpiteet jokien ekologisen tilan parantamiseksi, [http://www.ymparisto.fi/oulujoen-iijoenvesienhoitoalue www.ymparisto.fi/oulujoen-iijoenvesienhoitoalue]

Plug  M.C. Comparing the restored and unrestored an Ecosystem Service valuation of the Vääräjoki: A case study for the REFORM project. Amsterdam Free University. Master thesis (unpublished).

Restoration plan for Vääräjoki, unpublished.

Savolainen, M. ja Leiviskä, P. 2008. Kalajoen vesistön tulvantorjunnan toimintasuunnitelma. Pohjois-Pohjanmaan ympäristökeskuksen raportteja 2/2008.

The Finnish Environmental Information: Hertta database.

Vesien kunnostustyöryhmä. 2012. Vesien kunnostustyöryhmän loppuraportti. http://www.hare.vn.fi/mAsiakirjojenSelailu.asp?h_iId=16574&a_iId=180254


<references/>

[[Category:Case_studies]]

== Related Measures ==

<Forecasterlink type="getMeasuresForProject" code="256" />

== Related Pressures ==

<Forecasterlink type="getPressuresForProject" code="256" />

[[Category:Macrophytes and phytobenthos]] [[Category:Fish]] [[Category:Water Framework Directive]]

]