Difference between revisions of "KUIVAJOKI"

From REFORM wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Key features of the case study)
m (Site description)
Line 16: Line 16:
  
 
Water quality of the river is deteriorated due to human activities in the catchment. The main pressures in are peat mining, forestry and agriculture and municipal point sources.
 
Water quality of the river is deteriorated due to human activities in the catchment. The main pressures in are peat mining, forestry and agriculture and municipal point sources.
 +
  
 
==Site description==
 
==Site description==
 +
 +
'''Drivers, Pressures, Measures'''
 +
Fast-flowing riffle sections in Kuivajoki, as in most other Finnish rivers, were channelized to facilitate timber transport and for flood protection in early 1900s. Channelisation included removing boulders from the channel (Picture 3) which lead to loss of habitats and decreased heterogenity in stream flow patterns. Last timber was transported in Kuivajoki in 1954.
 +
 +
Restoration of channelised riffle sectionss started in Finland in 1970´s. Since then in total 2000 riffles and 1000 and breeding sites have been restored. The goals were to return the natural morphology of the streams and to create natural current conditions especially to enable breeding and migration of salmonid fish.
 +
 +
In Kuivajoki, altogether about 5 km of the river (consisting of multiple riffle sections in the river) were restored  in early 2000s. The stream bottom was rearranged using boulders were removed from the channel and placed along stream margins during channelization. Also gravel beds were created to provide nursery habitat for salmonids. The funding for the restorations came from regional water boards.
 +
 +
Also the regulation of Lake Oijärvi has been developed to prevent the drying of the natural stream at upper parts of Kuivajoki (where Oijärvi flows to Kuivajoki) and to enable the migration of fish at all water levels.
 +
 +
Riffles in upper part of Kuivajoki river are still channelized. Kuivajoki was chosen as a REFORM case study
 +
because it is among the few rivers in Finland that still had non-restored degraded upstream control sites to meet the study design of REFORM WP4. Kalliokoski is one of the channelized riffle sites and it is the  non-restored degraded control site in WP4 case study (Picture 2). Hirvaskoski is one of the riffle sections in River Kuivajoki where restoration measures were conducted and it is the restored site in WP4 case study (Picture 1).
  
 
==Measures selection==
 
==Measures selection==

Revision as of 16:22, 30 January 2014

KUIVAJOKI


Key features of the case study

River Kuivajoki is a mid-sized lowland boreal river, with 970 km2 catchment area. The river is 46 km long and descends 89 metres from Lake Oijärvi to Bothnian Bay, northern part of the Baltic Sea.

Lake Oijärvi is regulated for flood protection and for recreational use. From Lake Oijärvi, River Kuivajoki flows first 4 kilometers in two channels: in a natural channel and in an artificial regulation channel. At the upper part of the natural channel there is a submerged weir which may prevent fish migration during low water level. At the upper end of the regulation channel, there is a dam which is a migration barrier for fish.

River Kuivajoki is included in the Salmon Action Plan by International Baltic Sea Fishery Commission aiming to re-establish wild salmon population in the river. Kuivajoki is protected from hydropower construction by the Finnish Act on the protection of rapids.

Water quality of the river is deteriorated due to human activities in the catchment. The main pressures in are peat mining, forestry and agriculture and municipal point sources.


Site description

Drivers, Pressures, Measures Fast-flowing riffle sections in Kuivajoki, as in most other Finnish rivers, were channelized to facilitate timber transport and for flood protection in early 1900s. Channelisation included removing boulders from the channel (Picture 3) which lead to loss of habitats and decreased heterogenity in stream flow patterns. Last timber was transported in Kuivajoki in 1954.

Restoration of channelised riffle sectionss started in Finland in 1970´s. Since then in total 2000 riffles and 1000 and breeding sites have been restored. The goals were to return the natural morphology of the streams and to create natural current conditions especially to enable breeding and migration of salmonid fish.

In Kuivajoki, altogether about 5 km of the river (consisting of multiple riffle sections in the river) were restored in early 2000s. The stream bottom was rearranged using boulders were removed from the channel and placed along stream margins during channelization. Also gravel beds were created to provide nursery habitat for salmonids. The funding for the restorations came from regional water boards.

Also the regulation of Lake Oijärvi has been developed to prevent the drying of the natural stream at upper parts of Kuivajoki (where Oijärvi flows to Kuivajoki) and to enable the migration of fish at all water levels.

Riffles in upper part of Kuivajoki river are still channelized. Kuivajoki was chosen as a REFORM case study because it is among the few rivers in Finland that still had non-restored degraded upstream control sites to meet the study design of REFORM WP4. Kalliokoski is one of the channelized riffle sites and it is the non-restored degraded control site in WP4 case study (Picture 2). Hirvaskoski is one of the riffle sections in River Kuivajoki where restoration measures were conducted and it is the restored site in WP4 case study (Picture 1).

Measures selection

Success criteria

Ecological response

Hydromorphological response

Monitoring before and after implementation of the project

Socio-economic aspects

Contact person within the organization

Extra background information

References


Related Measures

Related Pressures