Difference between revisions of "Reduce groundwater extraction"

From REFORM wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
m (Expected effect of measure on (including literature citations):)
m (Useful references)
Line 38: Line 38:
  
 
Custodio, E. 2002. Aquifer overexploitation: what does it mean? Hydrogeology Journal  10:254–277
 
Custodio, E. 2002. Aquifer overexploitation: what does it mean? Hydrogeology Journal  10:254–277
 +
 +
Custodio, E., M. Manzano y J. Dolz (2006). El agua en Doñana: una perspectiva general. Informe Técnico
  
 
Hellegers P., D. Zilberman and E. van Ierland. 2001. Dynamics of agricultural groundwater extraction. Selected for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association in Chicago, August 5-8, 2001
 
Hellegers P., D. Zilberman and E. van Ierland. 2001. Dynamics of agricultural groundwater extraction. Selected for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association in Chicago, August 5-8, 2001
 +
 +
Manzano, M. (2001). Los humedales de Doñana y su relación con el agua subterránea. I Reunión Internacional de Expertos sobre la Regeneración Hídrica de Doñana-Proyecto Doñana 2005. 161–167.
 +
 +
Manzano, M. y Custodio, E. 2005. El acuífero de Doñana y su relación con el medio natural. Doñana: Agua y Biosfera (Eds. R. García Novo y C. Marín Cabrera). Doñana 2005 Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadalquivir. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. Madrid. 133–142; 163–164.
 +
 +
Manzano, M., Custodio, E. y Colomines, M. (2005). El fondo hidroquímico natural del acuífero de Doñana (SO España). V Congreso Ibérico de Geoquímica. IX Congreso de Geoquímica de España. Soria. 1–13.
  
 
==Other relevant information ==
 
==Other relevant information ==
  
 
[[Category:Measures]][[Category:01. Water flow quantity improvement]]
 
[[Category:Measures]][[Category:01. Water flow quantity improvement]]

Revision as of 12:31, 2 September 2010

Reduce groundwater extraction

Reduce groundwater extraction01. Water flow quantity improvement

General description

Implementing groundwater management and protection measures needs quantitative appraisal of aquifer evolution and effects based on detailed multidisciplinary studies, which have to be supported by reliable data (Custodio, 2002). Social and environmental constraints and the implication of skateholders should be taken into account to choose the restoration or mitigation measures. Some management options that could be studied as alternatives are the following:

  • Water rights should be properly defined and distributed so they are managed more efficiently and extractions decrease.
  • The quantity of water that can be extracted from each sector of the aquifer has to be defined according to the rate of recharge and discharge, the available stock, and water demand. But negative effects doesn´t necessary occur only when discharge is greater than recharge. They may be simply due to well interferences and the long transient period that follow changes in the aquifer water balance. Groundwater storage is depleted to some extent during the transient period after abstraction is increased (Custodio et al., 2001).
  • Water pricing is an appropriate tool to stimulate efficient water use: groundwater price understimates water value, and the environmental costs of its depletion. The internalisation of the negative as well as positive externalities on stock quality and quantity in the price of groundwater is particularly significant if the recharge of groundwater is large compared to stock size (Hellegers et al., 2001).
  • Improve water use efficiency (modernization of distribution infrastructures to reduce water losses, better irrigation practices, close-cycle systems and water recycling, etc).
  • Limit the expansion of irrigation surface and the construction of new wells.
  • Transformation of irrigated land into rain-fed crops or natural land, land acquisition.
  • Payment for Environmental Services and encouraging Best Management Practices to improve natural recharge and storage of water (terracing, creek management, reduction in planting phreatophyte forest areas).

Applicability

Expected effect of measure on (including literature citations):

  • HYMO (general and specified per HYMO element)

Rivers supplied primarily by underground water would seen increased their average flow. The groundwater level would rise and so the discharge into water courses would be increased partially restoring their natural flow regime. Temporal and permanent wetlands would recover their natural hydroperiod (Custodio et al.,Manzano et al.,2001)

  • physico � chemical parameters
  • Biota (general and specified per Biological quality elements)

Temporal and spatial response

Pressures that can be addressed by this measure

Cost-efficiency

Case studies where this measure has been applied

Useful references

Custodio, E. 2002. Aquifer overexploitation: what does it mean? Hydrogeology Journal 10:254–277

Custodio, E., M. Manzano y J. Dolz (2006). El agua en Doñana: una perspectiva general. Informe Técnico

Hellegers P., D. Zilberman and E. van Ierland. 2001. Dynamics of agricultural groundwater extraction. Selected for presentation at the annual meeting of the American Agricultural Economics Association in Chicago, August 5-8, 2001

Manzano, M. (2001). Los humedales de Doñana y su relación con el agua subterránea. I Reunión Internacional de Expertos sobre la Regeneración Hídrica de Doñana-Proyecto Doñana 2005. 161–167.

Manzano, M. y Custodio, E. 2005. El acuífero de Doñana y su relación con el medio natural. Doñana: Agua y Biosfera (Eds. R. García Novo y C. Marín Cabrera). Doñana 2005 Confederación Hidrográfica del Guadalquivir. Ministerio de Medio Ambiente. Madrid. 133–142; 163–164.

Manzano, M., Custodio, E. y Colomines, M. (2005). El fondo hidroquímico natural del acuífero de Doñana (SO España). V Congreso Ibérico de Geoquímica. IX Congreso de Geoquímica de España. Soria. 1–13.

Other relevant information